Comments on: A youtube comment about man as a social construction

By: sandra-ku

sandra-ku — Wed, 10 Dec 2008 18:47:06 +0000

Thanks a lot for this post

By: quodlibetor

quodlibetor — Tue, 18 Nov 2008 06:26:22 +0000

Really? what? Spam?

By: opef

opef — Sat, 15 Nov 2008 14:47:50 +0000

Thanks for this – great idea.

By: brandon

brandon — Sat, 08 Mar 2008 07:52:44 +0000

oh, uh, er: No argument, just a pathetic attempt at description of what a couple of terms mean. That guy, “hamazzufltasdkjetc” asked a couple of trollish questions and implied that philosophers were all a bunch of intellectual onanists. Something that really irks me and in this case i decided to respond. Unfortunately, UTOOB does not allow comments of more than 500 characters or some such limit, and so i didn’t actually respond. Not to him, anyway. But still, i stuck a very brief description of some concepts involved in postmodernism on the internet.

By: Eugene

Eugene — Wed, 05 Mar 2008 04:26:34 +0000

What are you arguing? That hitherto man was unaffected by his environment? Hasn’t man always been a synthesis of biology and environment? Maybe it’s only the idea of “environment” that has changed, due to the proliferation of media–which now constitutes more of our environment than any of its physical manifestations (i.e. family, neighbors, teachers, priests) creating a precedence of valuation in being a greater media presence than a greater human being (whatever the hell that is).

p.s. Hey Brandon, it’s Gene.