If a really interesting story is submitted with a title that is both boring and inaccurate there is no way to go in and fix it, and it can’t be re-submitted, AFAIK. Check that one out, look at the title, maybe read it (or at least read my comment on it) and tell me if that is no a disservice to the digg community?
Have i stumbled across a new way of gaming digg? Sort of anti-gaming, really, since most attempts are to promote things. But if i was, say, a creationist, i could go and just title every good pro-science article that i find with a nondescript and wildly inaccurate title, and goodbye the digg science section.
Same principle applies to mac fanboys.
Post a Comment