alright, so i’m sitting here wallowing in my own desire to use language in a manner completely uncharacteristic of said language and i think to myself, maybe i should write something? share this with the world? what’s the point? i asked myself in a conspiratorial whisper. it’s not like anybody ever understands me anyway, and do you even care if they do? well, not at moments like this, at moments like this all that i want to to say something. preferrably something with as little sense as possible so that the others can look at it and see whatever they want to see. like a fresh drop of molten wax, so wet and hot that every gaze leaves its impression. yes, sorta like that except not quite so sexual. you’ve got a dirty mind. only because of how much i like my sex to be dirty. anyway, that’s completely beside the point. oh yeah? you’re now claiming to have a point? of course! i always have a point, it’s just that i love the word “obfuscation” so much that i have to hide it just to get that word accross. man, foucault’s got nothing on you. hah, did you see they way nobody laughed at that? that’s because reference to the french doesn’t work in today’s political climate. says who? says johhhhhhhn kerry! you just said it like that ‘cus you liked “baseketball” and want to be as funny as trey parker. did not. did too. alright fine, but that’s fine, isn’t it? i mean trey parker is a really funny guy: are you saying that christian’s are wrong because they want to be like jesus? no, i’m saying christians are wrong because they want to kill women to stop them from killing babies, also for almost 1500 years of horrible, horrible oppression. that’s not christians, that’s christianity. no it’s not, it’s not christianity, it’s fucking christians, you think an ideological structure has ever commited any acts? haven’t you read marx? ideological superstructures are what create acts, the same way that thought creates acts. that’s a fine thing for someone who just referred to foucault to say. hey! you’re the one who just referred to foucault. that’s what i said.
2004 12 04
Post a Comment